In 2022, the United States will have to make difficult decisions on mines for the electric-vehicle metals

In 2022, the United States will have to make difficult decisions on mines for the electric-vehicle metals

Although the United States possesses enough lithium, copper, as well as other metals reserves to produce millions of electric vehicles (EVs), mounting opposition to new mining may compel the nation to rely on imports, delaying attempts to electrify the country’s autos.

The conflict highlights the difficulty that the United States has as it approaches 2022, a year that officials hope to see groundbreakings for a slew of electric vehicle manufacturing sites from General Motors Co (GM. N), Ford Motor Co (F.N), and others.

President Joe Biden stated earlier this year that when it comes to EV metals, he prefers to depend on partners, as part of an effort to appease environmentalists. As a result, in the worldwide race to electrification, American manufacturers will have to compete for supplies with international rivals.

However, expanding shipping from abroad mines to processing facilities, the majority of which are in Asia might increase greenhouse gas emissions, negating one of the arguments for creating more EVs. According to a Reuters study, proposed mining projects in the United States could create enough copper to manufacture more than 6 million electric vehicles, sufficient lithium to create more than 2 million electric vehicles, and sufficient nickel to create more than 60,000 electric vehicles.

As per research by Benchmark Mineral Intelligence, the estimations are determined by the volume of minerals necessary to produce a Tesla Inc (TSLA.O) Model 3, the globe’s most popular electric vehicle. Depending on the design, other forms of EV utilize varying quantities.

“If we don’t get some mining projects underway this year, we won’t have the raw materials to enable EV manufacture domestically,” James Calaway, who works as the executive chairman of the ioneer Ltd (INR.AX) firm, said.

In August, Biden signed an executive order mandating that by 2030, half of all the new vehicles sold be electric. So far, Washington has given its mining industry conflicting instructions. The US Fish and Wildlife Service, for example, is preparing to list a rare flower located on a few acres near ioneer’s Nevada lithium mining site as endangered, which might delay permitting. At the very same time, the US Department of Energy is debating whether or not to lend the firm over $300 million to fund the mine’s construction.



Other proposed mines are being opposed by indigenous organizations, ranchers, and environmentalists, highlighting a deeper conflict in the US as aversion to living close to a mine collides with the possibility of electric vehicles to reduce climate change.

In early 2022, the federal judges will decide whether mine licenses given by ex-President Trump to the Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC.TO) as well as Rio Tinto Plc (RIO.L) should be overturned in two distinct instances.

State officials in Minnesota are debating whether permits awarded to PolyMet Mining Corporation (POM.TO), a subsidiary of mining conglomerate Glencore Plc (GLEN.L), should be withdrawn or renewed. PolyMet’s mine would be a key nickel producer at a time when the only nickel mine in the United States is expected to close in 2025.

Piedmont Lithium Inc (PLL.O)’s failing to maintain local landowners informed of its expansion plans in North Carolina could lose the business crucial local zoning permissions. In October, Biden initiated measures to put a 20-year block on Antofagasta Plc’s (ANTO.L) Twin Metals copper as well as nickel mine project in Minnesota. The projected underground mine would become a significant copper supplier in the United States, as electric vehicles need twice as much copper as cars with internal combustion engines (ICEs).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *